JudgeAny EST. 2026
ReviewAudioNº 127 · Updated 2026-10-13

Cambridge Audio Melomania M100 Review: Hi-Fi Sound, Marathon Battery, Real Quirks

Cambridge Audio Melomania M100 review: hi-fi-tuned earbuds with marathon battery and effective ANC — but flat dynamics and flaky touch controls cost it the fifth star.

Words JudgeAny EditorsRead 4 minUpdated 2026-10-13Prices live on Amazon
Cambridge Audio Melomania M100 True Wireless Earbuds
JA 8.4
Fig. 01 — Cambridge Audio Melomania M100 True Wireless EarbudsMargin notes · sourced

Our editorial verdict, built on published evidence: the Melomania M100 is the mid-range earbud to pick when you sit down and actually listen — TechRadar's "sublime clarity," distortion-free full volume per Digital Trends, and a 52-hour case that reviewers keep underlining. It is not the fifth-star earbud because of real, repeated quirks: What Hi-Fi? docked a star for flat dynamics against the AirPods Pro 2, SoundGuys flagged a bouncing-noise quirk at max ANC, and the touch controls frustrate nearly everyone. At $219 it undercuts the $299 Sony WF-1000XM5 meaningfully, and it has sold for $159 before. Check the current price on Amazon.

— THE VERDICT · JUDGEANY EDITORS

Hi-Fi tuning in a mid-range shell

The Melomania M100 arrived in March 2024 at $219 as Cambridge Audio's flagship earbud — a hi-fi company, not a gadget brand, building its first serious ANC true-wireless set. The hardware reads like a spec sheet from a much pricier pair: 10 mm drivers, Class A/B amplification borrowed from the company's CX-series stereo amps, Bluetooth 5.3 on a Qualcomm QCC3071 chip, and aptX Lossless plus aptX Adaptive up to 24-bit/96 kHz on the Snapdragon Sound platform. The voice prompts are read by British comedian Matt Berry, which reviewers keep mentioning because it is exactly the kind of unforced detail a hi-fi house would sweat. This review is built from published reviews and owner feedback. We don't run a test lab: every measurement below belongs to the outlet that published it, and the score is our editorial judgment based on that public evidence.

Sound: clean, refined, and a little too polite

This is the reason to buy. TechRadar scored sound 4.5/5 and wrote of "sublime clarity across the frequencies," while Digital Trends listened at punishing volumes and reported distortion was all but inaudible even with the volume pinned. Out-of-the-box tuning lands warm and balanced, and a seven-band EQ (with up to 20 custom presets) covers the rest. The asterisk comes from What Hi-Fi?, which gave the earbuds four stars overall and docked the fifth almost entirely for dynamics: next to the more agile AirPods Pro 2, the M100 sounds flat — "the M100 could do with an energy shot" — and it applies the same polished character to every recording instead of flexing with the music. Our read: a lovely sit-down listening sound, just not the most exciting one at the price.

Noise cancelling: effective, with a footnote reviewers agree on

Trusted Reviews calls the ANC effective, tested it at 50% volume with 11% drain per hour (right on the rated curve), and rates the call quality as one of the strongest it has seen in true wireless — noisy-street callers heard no background noise or wind. TechRadar found the design comfortable and easy to wear. But two outlets complicate the picture, and we are putting both here because the brochures won't. SoundGuys' travel-roundup testing flagged a bouncing-noise quirk at the highest ANC setting, and Trusted Reviews independently noted the ANC can feel "a little too adaptive at times," as if the level-hunting draws attention to itself. Nobody disputes that the ANC works; the honest version is that its strongest mode is the one you may want to avoid. Transparency mode is the weak link — What Hi-Fi? called it outright "poor," with ambient sound nearly inaudible over music.

The quirks are real and they are consistent

Nearly every outlet trips over the same small failures. Touch controls are unreliable: Tom's Guide reported slow, inconsistent commands with no confirmation tones for volume or track changes, and Android Police found the touch spots hard to land. Wear detection only triggers when both earbuds come out and resumes when both go back in — Digital Trends and Tom's Guide both called the logic odd. Comfort is genuinely split: What Hi-Fi? gave comfort a full 5/5, while Android Police (on smaller ears) reported discomfort after 30 minutes. GamesRadar+ found the 80 ms game mode too slow for competitive play — these are music earbuds first. The case is bigger than rivals', there is no color but black, and IPX4 covers the buds only. None of these is fatal alone; together they explain why four stars, not five, is the consensus.

Battery life and value: the two arguments that win

Cambridge Audio claims 10 hours per charge and 33 hours total with ANC on, 16 and 52 hours with it off, plus a 10-minute charge worth roughly 1.5 hours of ANC-on listening. Trusted Reviews' drain test landed on the rated curve, and Android Police ran them loud for 7 hours and still had 40% left. At the $219 launch price (March 2024, per Digital Trends) that is already well under the $299 Sony WF-1000XM5 and $249 AirPods Pro 2 USB-C that Tom's Guide used as anchors — and TechRadar reported a Prime Day cut to $159 in the US. Cambridge Audio has earned a reputation for long battery life and it shows here. Judged against the published evidence, the M100 is the mid-range pair to pick when you sit down to listen seriously, as long as you don't mind touch controls that occasionally ignore you. Check the current price on Amazon.

On Film

Video review · third-party footage, not filmed by JudgeAny
Cambridge Audio M100 Review vs Sennheiser MTW4 vs the BEST! (Sony, Jabra, Technics) · Aaron X Loud and WirelessVia YouTube
Sound qualityTechRadar 4.5/5 · flat dynamics docked a star8.5
Noise cancellingEffective · bouncing-noise quirk at max ANC7.8
Comfort & fitWhat Hi-Fi? 5/5 vs small-ear complaints7.7
Battery life16 h buds · 52 h with case (ANC off)9.4
Value$219 vs $299 XM5 · $159 sale precedent8.6
JudgeAny Score8.4

The Dossier

Technical file · compiled from specs & reviews
Driver10 mm dynamic, recycled neodymium magnets
AmplificationClass A/B (CX-series derived)
Bluetooth5.3, Qualcomm QCC3071
CodecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive (24-bit/96 kHz), AAC, SBC
Battery life (ANC on)10 h earbuds; 33 h with case
Battery life (ANC off)16 h earbuds; 52 h with case
Quick charge10 min ≈ 1.5 h playback (ANC on)
Wireless chargingQi supported
Microphones6 (3 per earbud), Qualcomm cVc
Water resistanceIPX4
Weight6.65 g per earbud; 53.3 g case
Eartips3 pairs silicone + 2 pairs memory foam

+ WHAT EARNS IT

  • TechRadar: sound 4.5/5, "sublime clarity across the frequencies"
  • 16-hour earbud / 52-hour case battery (ANC off) — among the best in class
  • Trusted Reviews: one of the strongest true-wireless call ratings — no background noise or wind
  • aptX Lossless + aptX Adaptive to 24-bit/96 kHz on Snapdragon Sound
  • $219 launch price undercuts the $299 Sony WF-1000XM5 — Tom's Guide calls the value standout

− WHAT COSTS IT

  • What Hi-Fi? withheld the fifth star for flat dynamics — "the M100 could do with an energy shot" next to AirPods Pro 2
  • SoundGuys flags a bouncing-noise quirk at the highest ANC setting; Trusted Reviews says ANC can be "a little too adaptive"
  • Touch controls are unreliable — slow, inconsistent, no confirmation tones (Tom's Guide, Android Police)
  • Transparency mode is poor, with ambient sound nearly inaudible over music (What Hi-Fi?)
  • Small-ear comfort is contested (Android Police vs What Hi-Fi?'s 5/5); bulky case, black only

Keep comparing

Same evidence standard · our reviews

Sources

Every major conclusion above maps to a source here · see our methodology.

Questions, answered

How does the Melomania M100 compare to the Sony WF-1000XM5?
The M100 launched at $219 against the $299 WF-1000XM5. You get cleaner detail and far better battery (16/52 h ANC off) from the Cambridge Audio pair, but Sony holds the edge on ANC refinement and dynamics. Tom's Guide called the M100's value standout at this gap.
Does the Melomania M100 support aptX Lossless?
Yes — aptX Lossless and aptX Adaptive up to 24-bit/96 kHz on the Snapdragon Sound platform. You need a Snapdragon Sound–certified Android phone to use them; without one the earbuds fall back to AAC or SBC.
Is the Melomania M100 worth it for iPhone users?
Yes, with a caveat. Android Police tested them with an iPhone and still rated them highly, and the warm default tuning needs no app tweaks. But iPhones can't use aptX Lossless, so you pay for a codec you'll never hear.
How long does the Melomania M100 battery last?
Cambridge Audio rates 10 hours per charge and 33 hours total with ANC on, 16 and 52 hours with ANC off. Trusted Reviews measured 11% drain per hour at 50% volume — right on the rated curve — and Android Police got 7 loud hours and still had 40% left.
Does the Melomania M100 support LE Audio and Auracast?
Cambridge Audio's official line is that LE Audio and Auracast support arrives via firmware update. That's the stated position — we would not treat it as a reason to buy until it ships.
FILED UNDER · BEST AUDIO 2026

The one to buy.

Our editorial verdict, built on published evidence: the Melomania M100 is the mid-range earbud to pick when you sit down and actually listen — TechRadar's "sublime clarity," distortion-free full volume per Digital Trends, and a 52-hour case that reviewers keep underlining. It is not the fifth-star earbud because of real, repeated quirks: What Hi-Fi? docked a star for flat dynamics against the AirPods Pro 2, SoundGuys flagged a bouncing-noise quirk at max ANC, and the touch controls frustrate nearly everyone. At $219 it undercuts the $299 Sony WF-1000XM5 meaningfully, and it has sold for $159 before. Check the current price on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, JudgeAny earns from qualifying purchases. Price and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.

Cambridge Audio Melomania M100 True Wireless EarbudsCambridge Audio
Check Price